Jump to content

User talk:Dogru144/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Speedy deletion of Nova Development

A tag has been placed on Nova Development requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FrankTobia (talk) 03:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

My apologies, I did not mean to bite. I still feel that the article meets speedy deletion criterion A7 by not asserting its notability whatsoever. The subject of the article needs to be notable in order to be included on wikipedia, and the article needs to say why it's notable. That is my only issue. -FrankTobia (talk) 04:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I advise against immediately re-creating the article, as it would be liable for speedy deletion under criterion G4: recreation of deleted material. The reason your article got deleted after only 14 hours is because it went through the speedy deletion process, and not proposed deletion or articles for deletion. I recommend reading up on Wikipedia's deletion policy for the differences.
I'm willing to work with you on this article, though. My suggestion is you re-create the article in your user space, for instance, at /Nova Development. You can work on it there until it's suitable for inclusion on the mainspace, and then you can move it there. I can help you at any stage of the process. Let me know. -FrankTobia (talk) 18:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Tagging an article for speedy deletion isn't really a right. Anyone who can edit Wikipedia can tag an article for speedy deletion. Keep in mind that I did not delete your article, an administrator did. I tagged it as meeting a requirement for candidates for speedy deletion. I recommend reading WP:SPEEDY, the criterion it fell under was A7. In hindsight perhaps I was too quick to tag it, so I would like to help make it up to you. Would you like me to work with you in order to improve your article? Please let me know. -FrankTobia (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I made a few tweaks, and I think the article is now good for inclusion in the mainspace. The important part is that the lead section now asserts the notability of the company. The rest of it is a great start as well. Would you like me to move it back, or shall you do the honors? -FrankTobia (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nova Development

A tag has been placed on Nova Development, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: No fair hearing on speedy deletion of Nova Development

I didn't delete Nova Development. I probably deleted a broken redirect to it, but not any actual content. And, lighten up a bit, eh? : - ) Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

And I didn't delete it either. From the deletion log:
18:19, May 30, 2008 Gwen Gale (Talk | contribs) deleted "Nova Development" (G11: Blatant advertising)
 – ukexpat (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Unblock request

You may to want to use the {{unblock}} template to request an administrator review the block. For instance: 

{{unblock|I don't think my edits were disruptive.  I just made a redirect.  I was not warned.}}

You should make sure your request is courteous and clear. You add this request to the bottom of your talk page. JackSchmidt (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Help request for unblocking

Dogru144 (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Please help I have been blocked from editing by User:Deb.

I contacted her to contest a redirect; and I have been prevented from communicating with her or communicating with an administrator for arbitration.

I was attempting to create an article stub, for a redirect.Dogru144 (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Chinese apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I think there has been some confusion. :-) The notification above concerns Allegations of apartheid, not Allegations of Chinese apartheid. The latter article was deleted a long time ago. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

National Gang Center

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National Gang Center, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the problem with automated functions. If a human oversaw the original edit, a human would see that (a) quotes were used , and (b) the source was openly attributed. Dogru144 (talk) 22:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Earl Hines discography

Great start good-Dogru144 Thanx 81.251.41.91 (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)..... ..... and better continuation [to Earl Hines discography] - thanx again 83.197.147.60 (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 1 Aug 2008

Re user page vandals

You're very welcome. I just fired another warning shot at that one IP. De728631 (talk) 13:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

reply, joe

I am not too concerned about Joe the Plumber. However, I thought the article should be named after Joe the Plummer since the article should be about the concept and incident more than a person named Joe W. The emphasis should be on what happened more than where Joe W. went to high school and where he was born. Chergles (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Reported

You have been reported here: WP:ANI#User:Dogru144. Schuym1 (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 20:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

But the film didn't get significant coverage in reliable sources. I'm not abusing anything. Schuym1 (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The film has over 200 hits in a google search. Referring cites span from Australia to South Korea. Dogru144 (talk) 00:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
That doesn't show notability per WP:NF. Did you even read the guideline? Schuym1 (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
You were canvassing! if you canvass again, I will report you. Schuym1 (talk) 01:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I can, if it goes against major policies which is what you did by canvassing! You can get blocked for doing that. Schuym1 (talk) 01:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Canvassing

I'd be grateful if you would read Wikipedia:Canvassing. Your concern for an article which is undergoing an AfD appears to have made you overstep the canvassing boundary. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

It's always better to draw users attention to the AfD in a neutral fashion, rather than wondering if they'd be interested in preserving the article. Bottom line is that failure to go down the neutral line leaves you open to the sort of issues which User:Schuym1 is raising. And that would be your own own-goal. You should have enough confidence in the ability of others to judge for themselves, and you should be willing to accept that other have different views from you as to the notability of the film. --Tagishsimon (talk)

I have read the canvassing page. For me, the key element, right at the top is: Under certain conditions it is acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, but messages that are written to influence the outcome rather than to improve the quality of a discussion compromise the consensus building process and may be considered disruptive. Your messages crossed that boundary. But by my count we are talking about 1.5 messages, which is small enough beer that it does not IMO deserve the ANI listing. Meanwhile your communications should not be amended or deleted, except by the owner of a talk page. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I would presume that neutral tone alerting of a small number of people, informing them of the AfD, as opposed to advocacy is permissible. Absolutely. IMO=In my opinion. ANI = Administrator's Noticeboard /Incidents. (if these were the things you didn't understand). I think the rule of thumb is, explain in the AfD exactly why it should not be deleted; canvass if you must in a neutral fashion, and consider whether canvassing is worth it. I have not looked in enough detail, but a comment by t'other chap led me to believe that the people you canvassed had made minor changes - such people are more likely to be of the class of people who make small changes to many articles, than people who have a specific interest in the subject matter of the article to the extent they'd be motivated to get involved in an AfD. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

You say "think that my notices fell under the category of the following from the WP:Canvassing site.". My response: No they didn't, since they were not neutral. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I identify "Thought you might be interested in preserving the article." as the neutrality problem. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Wiki vandalism.

Hi,

In one of your latest contribution you referred to "wiki vandalism scandals in last 2 weeks". I was totally unaware of this happening and I would greatly appreciate if you could provide more details regarding this situation. Thank you. --Jazzeur (talk) 04:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11

I have nominated Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: The Health Impact of 9/11 (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Aervanath (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

LA Metro Maps

I used Adobe Illustrator to create the maps. RickyCourtney (talk) 06:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Well they are both Adobe programs. If you know one, learning the other will be easier. But what they are used for is different. InDesign is for page layout and Illustrator is specifically for drawing. RickyCourtney (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

John Blake, Jr.

It's my pleasure! Can we find a photo? Badagnani (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Gothic architecture

You made a comment on the talk page which still hasn't been responded to. Your comment was that the article focusses on churches and castles. You requested that shops and modest-scale domestic architecture be dealt with.

The gaps in the article are quite large. In fact, castles are not dealt with, and need to be. Another form of Gothic architecture which is not fully treated is parish churches (which in England are a distinct architectural category to cathedrals and abbey churches. This is not the case in many other countries). Also town halls, (which in the Low Countries are a very distinct category), palaces and large homes (which the article doesn't deal with) and barns and trade halls.

When it comes to shops and modest-scale domestic architecture in the Gothic style, it is largely missing from many areas, because the domestic architecture was in wood, and was built in the local vernacular which maintained a vernacular style regardless of the period eg. a thatched cottage tends to look like a thatched cottage regardless of the century it was built in. This is not to say that there were not distinct forms to modest-scale domestic architecture, and a definite development, but that the characteristic features of the "Gothic Style" were not present, or if the were, then it was a decorative treatment to the openings, rather than structual features eg clustered columns and ribbed vaulting.

In regions where the town buildings of the period are commonly of stone. ie parts of France, northern Itlay etc, there are relatively modest town houses that have windows with pointed arches rather than round ones, and doors that are detailed by mouldings of a Gothic form. Otherwise, they are almost indistinguishable from the earlier or later houses with differently-shaped windows. Elsewhere signs of the Gothic style are unexpectedly rare. Only one single example of modest domestic architecture from the medieval period remains in Paris, and (when I saw it in 2005) was disgracefully unmaintained.

Generally, the houses that demonstrate true Gothic style are the large ones, built by rich merchants, bishops and landed gentry. There are also many Alms Houses of this period, generally with wealthy patrons.

Because of the length of the present article, the best way to go is to write a separate article on Gothic domestic architecture. As for Castles... well, I have no doubt that wiki has a page, but I have never ventured to look at it. Amandajm (talk) 07:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for you reply. I tried to write a parag. on Castles in the article with a link to the main, but my link crashed and lost it, as happens fairly frequently. I stupidly changed to a different company recently and have had problems every since. Anyway, I looked at the Castles page and found that it traces the development of castles as an architectural form very well, even though it doesn't touch on "style" which is obviously less significant than the structural development. Definitely worth a look. As for all the other things.... well, I'll check out what has ben written. There are a great many monographs on specific houses, quite a few of which are FAs because user:Giano has been beavering away at them. It might be possible to make some pertinent links. I have no idea what has been done about domestic architecture other than in England.
Amandajm (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire/archive1

Hi, Dogru144! Sorry to disturb you, but I saw from this category that you are a member of WikiProject Turkey, and the List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire is currently a featured list candidate. If you could take some of your time and review it on its nomination page, I would be very grateful. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Dogru144! I think you misunderstood the whole issue. The List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire is not up for deletion, on the contrary: it is a featured list candidate, meaning that if its nomination is successful it will be promoted to featured (quality) status. You can find more about the featured list process here: WP:FL. No one has ever talked about deleting the list. Therefore, could you please remove and/or change the comment you left? What I asked you as a member of WikiProject Turkey was simply to look at it and review it to see if there is room for improvement (like the comments left by other users): do you think the lead is OK ? do you think it should be shortened? is there important information that you think has been wrongly omitted? etc... Comments such as these are what I was asking for. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Support for deleting the Category:Anti-Armenianism

Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?

It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.

Thank you

81.214.147.154 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.147.154 (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Your comments in my talk page

First, the "point" you seconded had nothing to do with portraits, but with a photograph of then-president-elect Obama and then-vice-president-elect Biden visiting the Court; the editor put it in several sections, and it belonged to none of them. I was not the only person who requested her to justify the inclusion at which point she flew into a rage. So you aren't really "seconding" any point, but making a comment completely out of context and misunderstanding what you are referring to. Second, the proper place to talk about improvements to the article is the article's talk page, not the talk page of one of the many editors who have contributed to that article. I invite you to post your comment/request/complaint there, not in my talk page; and the article does have portraits in it, so I don't know what you are referring to. Thirdly, I am not on-line at all instants. I have not seen whatever changes you are referring to in the Stevens page. It's not exactly great manners to go around poking people because they don't act as quickly as you think they ought to, or in the instant you thing they should have. Magidin (talk) 03:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Stevens

No, it is not inconsistent with the current lead paragraph. What you added was pretty much random trivia, much along the lines of baseball statistics on batting average on Wednesday night when batting against a left-hander following a switch hitter. While it might belong in the body of the article, it does not belong on the lead. The current sentences relate to important facets of Stevens career and position in the court, not random trivia. Magidin (talk) 03:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Jackson

Hi Dogru, can you keep an eye on the writing when you add material to the Jackson article? Your first edit didn't say who Muhammad was. Your second edit said, "In 2004 popular music singer Michael Jackson ..." as though we didn't realize that's who the article was about. The article's being read by a lot of people, and adding anything that's not quite right is going to lead to people reverting and you reverting back, and so on. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate that. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 00:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

tenther movement

I have no problem with you deleting "tax funded" as I was searching for a way to qualify that statement, and it seemed most appropriate. Something has to be done with that sentence, as all self-identified "tenthers" do not ascribe to the belief as it is stated. For example, both Ricky Perry and Michelle Bachmann work for the federal goverment. The intro will need some refinement, or a reliable source used as a reference for the statement being accurate. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 13:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Northeast Philadelphia

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process after the original re-assessor had to drop out. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Northeast Philadelphia/GA1. I have placed the article on hold for a further seven days whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:15, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maritza Davila

A tag has been placed on Maritza Davila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maritza Davila

A tag has been placed on Maritza Davila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 23:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Maritza Davila, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 23:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Non-valid deleting authority

What authority does User:Andyjsmith have in hastily deleting legitimate articles?

Is there any due process? All of his wikipdeia activity seems to be only scolding people for illegitinate articles.

As I have written, at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maritza_Davila

Davila is a legitimate subject of a biography. All User:Andyjsmith (is he an administrator?) does is refer to proscribed subjects but he does not indicate how the subject fits into the category. His reference to previous deletion moves is a circular argument in the absence of an explanation of how the current article relates to proscribed topics. Dogru144 (talk) 01:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to Skin (disambiguation)

I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to this page, because it introduced a second "blue link" to an entry. Dab page entries should have at most one blue link per entry. If you want to add the actress' name, here's one way to do it without linking to the actress:

Skin (2009 film), a biographical film starring Sophie Okonedo as Sandra Laing

Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of World fusion music

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is World fusion music. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World fusion music. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tenther movement

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tenther movement. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenther movement. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Esparks

The article Esparks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Google search suggests that this chain is neither notable nor still open.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fayenatic (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Deleted article

You can contact the administrator who deleted the page to get the text [1] --mboverload@ 20:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

attila the hun

hi dogru i see you are in the central asia project. theres a big problem about Attila the Hun article, nowadays the page is under attack by some so-called crusaders like user:Richard Keatinge and his mate "so-called admin". they succeeded to remove pictures and art works in the page. i need your help, regards.--Hash Jedi Kaen (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dogru144. You have new messages at Talk:Bjørn_Lomborg#Proposed_edit.
Message added 12:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kirsten Gillibrand

The information you inserted in this article at least partially verifiably incorrect. I corrected it and added a citation. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Jay Townsend

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jay Townsend. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jay Townsend

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jay Townsend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alexf(talk) 16:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

April 2011

Please do not make contentious edits against WP:CONSENSUS, and do not edit war, as you have at Bernardine Dohrn.[2][3][4] The article talk page is for discussing these things and attempting to convince other editors to your position. Thanks, - 11:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Clokey

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Joe Clokey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

New Mexico State Road 14

I have reverted your edit which reverted the changes I made to the junction list on this article. I removed the Madrid and Golden lines twice because there are no major intersections in either town. On top of that, the table was incorrectly formatted, which my edits fixed.

In addition, the factoid to which I was referring was about the HGTV Dream House, which has been tagged with {{cn}} as needing a citation. –Fredddie™ 22:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Incomplete AFD nominations

Hello, you recently started deletion discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lester Leaps In and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countless Blues. They were incomplete so weren't listed on the AFD log and probably wouldn't have been seen by many people. I have (I think) fixed them. Instructions for starting AFD discussions are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. I'm not sure why the standard AFD template was missing from the discussion pages - did you perhaps you deleted them as you were creating the pages? Also, by the way, you don't need to add your reasons for deletion to the AFD talkpage. --BelovedFreak 15:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. --BelovedFreak 16:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One Voice (Iowa)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on One Voice (Iowa) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGaw (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of One Voice (Iowa)

The article One Voice (Iowa) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGaw (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Jon Meacham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Need to Know (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi Dogru144,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk@wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

World Factoring Yearbook

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 14:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited May 1947 crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited J. Arch Getty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The New York Times just quoted you

Seriously: [5] Khazar2 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Cotton Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Color line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

 New England Wikimedia General Meeting

The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
Potential topics:
Sunday, April 22
1:30 PM – 4:30 PM
Conference Room C06, Johnson Building,
Boston Public Library—Central Library
700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Hi. When you recently edited Sandwich Train Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyannis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Boston Wiknic

 Great American Wiknic - Boston

The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park!
Saturday, June 23
1:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Boston Common
  • Food
  • Fun
  • Fellowship
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 19:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Consumer Choice Marketing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 03:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gustavo Bounous

The article Gustavo Bounous has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability criteria, and article lacks references to reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 19:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

Hello, Dogru144.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medina Railroad Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rochester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Columbia County, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rutland, Vermont
Interstate Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sleeper car
Passaic-Bergen Rail Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hoboken
Raritan Valley Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Allentown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at WP Brands – Lists compiled for project banner tagging using AnomieBOT

A discussion is occurring at the talk page for WikiProject Brands at Proceeding with automatic project banner tagging using AnomieBOT regarding moving forward with automatic talk page tagging with the project's banner using AnomieBOT. All members of this project will be notified with neutrally-worded notifications about this discussion, and please feel free to contribute to it. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:16, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoboken Terminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Cities (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Named Passenger Train table at Hoboken Terminal

I see you converted the list of former named passenger trains at Hoboken Terminal into a chart. Are you planning to add something similar with any other stations? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 02:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I've done this at Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal, Wikipedia's name for the Central Railroad of New Jersey's Communipaw Terminal. Dogru144 (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The above terminal is in Jersey City, New Jersey directly south of Hoboken on the Hudson River harbor.Dogru144 (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

My U.S. Roads projects

Are you referring to my work on the U.S. Roads in Florida? Because they need a lot of work, and so do the state highways. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cincinnati Museum Center at Union Terminal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Southern Railway
Fort Street Union Depot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Red Arrow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air-line railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoboken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Puerto Vallarta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Nogales and Calexico
Los Mochis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nogales, Mexico

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paterson (NJT station), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oyster Bay Branch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double-decker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Les Alternatifs

Hello Dogru144,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Les Alternatifs for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 'S Make It, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gilmore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of 'S Make It for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 'S Make It is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'S Make It until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 16:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Payphone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telephone operator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 'S Make It, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gilmore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of named passenger trains of the United States (N-R) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hoboken
List of named passenger trains of the United States (S-Z) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hoboken

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bradley University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical education (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Western New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Elmira and Hoboken
Lackawanna Cut-Off (NJ Transit) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Right of way
Lake Clear, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lake Placid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Zwerin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High School of Music and Art (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pittsburgh Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altoona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Central Railroad of New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Capitol Limited
Westchester County, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hudson Line

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review

Hi. Since you are an experienced editor in Wikipedia's jazz project, would you be interested in reviewing my good article nomination for Of Human Feelings? Normally I'd wait despite the backlogged list, but I'm looking forward to nominating it for FA as well. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

There's a link at the article's talk page to start the review; more info is available here on reviewing. Dan56 (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
The article has been picked up and passed. I have now nominated it for FA here, if you're interested. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 18:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The National Memo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partisan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Jarrett discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Lloyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marianne Rosenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 20 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Art Blakey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gilmore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Sara Dylan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Dylan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Dylan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Alatari (talk) 13:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fox Attacks

The article Fox Attacks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable online video campaign. Lacks multiple reliable sources specifically about the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Fox Attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fox Attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Jews in Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estado Novo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dogru144. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 06:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

John from Idegon (talk) 06:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bowling Green, Kentucky. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
I don't get it. You started a discussion and then just reinstate your preferred version without engaging in discussion? The section I removed is factually incorrect, and your references are not WP:RS. The problem I have is that BG is STILL a vital rail center. The copy you wrote insinuates that its connection to rail transport is only historic. It may be a fundamental misunderstanding of rail's role in contemporary transportation on your part. That is not at all an uncommon misconception, but it is not a misconception this encyclopedia should re-enforce. Please engage on the talk page and do not continue to edit war. Thank you. 

 John from Idegon (talk) 06:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Unfair charge that this is edit war by the person that has committed the edit war

It takes to commit an edit war. This feels very unfair. It appears that this note is created by User:John from Idegon. It is unfair that I have been given the party at dispute with me. Each step of the way I have attempted to communicate with the User, in the edit summary and on the Talk Page.Dogru144 (talk) 06:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Uncivil tone

Firstly, User:John from Idegon is saying on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring: in his dispute over Bowling Green, Kentucky "What's a boy to do, I ask ya?" Are you kidding me? This sounds like schoolyard talk. I would hope that editors of an encyclopedia can be civil. Secondly, User:John from Idegon said that he removed a link because he didn't like it. This is not a matter of like or not like. If I provide content with documentation then it is valid and can remain.Dogru144 (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dogru144/Archive_2&oldid=1142971931"